Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” Speech

Nhat Nguyen Patrick Clayton Cantrell English 1010-051 23 October, 2012 Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther powerfulness jr. s I Have a Dream Speech Amidst the bigotry and racial violence of the cultivated Rights Move manpowert, there stood a shining example of brotherhood, unity, and an undying thirst for equality. In what was known as the skirt of Washington, an estimated total of 200,000 people of all racesobservers estimated that 7580% of the marchers were murky and the rest werewhiteand non-black minoritiestook to the streets of Washington D.C. on August 28, 1963 in an effort to raise aw arness of the ongoing racial disadvantage in the browse field and in everyday life. It was on this momentous day that the great Martin Luther fag Jr. , whizz of the most powerful and influential voices of the obliging Rights Movement, gave whiz of historys most memorable vernaculares. His speech, later(prenominal) came to be known as the I Have a Dream speech, served to bring into light th e injustice experienced daily by the African American population of the United States.In his famous speech, mightiness depict the racial discrimination and social inequalities that inhabit the great country whose creed explicitly states all men are created equal. This constituted the main purpose of his speech to encourage and empower the attendees and those at home to gainsay the widespread discrimination and the status quo of the time. Bigotry had a stranglehold on all aspects of life during the Civil Rights era. From childhood, racial themes and motifs were embedded into the very organism of the child. A plethora of consequences arose from this.Whites usually aged into adulthood with the touch that racial superiority belonged to them because of the color of their skin. Most African Americans, on the other hand, grew up with beliefs very untold contradictory to those of their white counterparts. Many aged with the preconceived notion that racial inferiority accompanied being black. Martin Luther queer, in his speech, endeavored to end this narrow-minded approach to race by encouraging his audience to rise in a higher place what they once accepted as a social norm and be the light that would lead that contemporaries out of blind hatred for their fellow an. He preached brotherhood and equality and electrified the crowd when he demanded the adjacent realization of the promises of democracy (King). He galvanized the crowd to rebel from the dark, secluded valley of segregation and enter into the sunstruck path of racial justice (King). He closed this portion of his speech by once again reiterating the importance of immediate action. He called for justice for all of mankind, be they black, white, or any other race.Besides the self-explanatory fact that he was calling to the audience present, Kings speech was meant for a much broader audience. Specifically, his speech was targeted at those who desired to continue the economic and social oppression of A frican Americans. This could clearly be seen when King states, And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and result now be pith will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual (King). In this sentence, King concentrated his words against those. Those are the people who continued to disregard African Americans as equals. King wanted to make it known that he and millions alike would not quit until justice was dealt and democracy rang through and through the land. In another explicit example, King talks directly to those again. There are those who are communicate the devotees of civil rights, When will you be convenient? (King). He goes on to answer this question by adage that he and other civil rights activists will never be satisfied so long as injustice and discrimination remain a synonymous part of the United States culture.He ensured the people whose intentions were to physically, mentally, and economically reject African Americans tha t America will not experience rest or tranquility until all black men, women, and children are granted their rights as citizens. The speech was as much a message to those oppressed as it was to the oppressors. Martin Luther Kings speech was well formatted with respect to harmony, with each prior point flowing harmoniously into the next. It was organized into two halves.The first fractional portrayed American society as a cesspit of intolerance, racism, and close-mindedness, and it also revealed the incongruence between the themes of the American Dream and the suffering of African Americans. In the first half of the speech, King called for action to alleviate these overriding themes in American society. In his now is the time paragraph, King emphasised to the audience that the time for action is now and rejected gradualism. In his we can never be satisfied paragraph, he set the conditions that must be met before he and others like him can rest.The second half of the speech depicte d the dream of a fairer, more perfect union, free from the shackles of segregation and racial discord. In the most memorable part of the speech, Martin Luther King famously stopped reading from his written speech and began to speak earnestly of his dream concerning the future of America. In the part of the speech that became its namesake, King repeatedly bellows the phrase, I have a dream (King). In a brief 3-minute period, King gave ace of historys most beautiful pieces of rhetoric, summoning boisterous cheers from the masses of people.King concluded his masterpiece by articulating to the crowd his ken of a democratic America, emancipated from the chains of prejudice. His dream was that individuals from all corners of societydifferent in color, culture, and beliefscould one day gather together in unity with respect for one another. His comprehensive use of metaphors, imagery, and repeating served to persuade the audience to remain optimistic and faithful in the face of prejudice and despair. He appealed greatly to the crowds sense emotion and logic.He also masterfully used anaphora and allusions on some(prenominal) occasions in his moving speech. From under the shadow of the capital of Nebraska Memorial, King fittingly began his speech alluding to Lincolns famous Gettysburg Address. He started by saying five score years ago (King). This aided in setting the mood for the rest of the speech and was particularly poignant since King was speaking from the stairs on the Lincoln Memorial. King also alluded to the Declaration of Independence when speaking of the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This allusion potently reiterated Americas promise to all her people. There are several allusions to Biblical changeovers in the speech. mayhap one of the most notable was when King warned the oppressors of civil rights that he and everyone who challenged discrimination will never redeem until justice rolls down like waters, and right eousness like a mighty stream (King). This was reference to Amos 524. It appealed impressively to the audiences emotions, stirring up shouts of hallelujah within the crowd. Metaphors were used throughout the speech to ease emphasize and sometimes exaggerate the ppression experienced by the African American population during that era. King oft compared discrimination to a desolate valley and the path to racial justice as a sunstruck one. He would ofttimes describe oppression as a searing heat to intensify the pain that it caused. He described African Americans poor economic position as a lonely island of prosperityin the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity (King). This helped accentuate the situation that African Americans were in. King incorporated anaphora and repetition in his speech in order to stress the importance of hear themes.One of the lesser known anaphora used was Kings repetition of one hundred years later (King). Here, King referred to the fact that 100 year s after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation, his people are still hampered by the weight of inequality. He repeated the phrase now is the time (King) in an adjudicate to inspire the audience to act immediately and to demand change that instance. The most famous and most often cited anaphora used was the repetition of the phrase I have a dream (King) In that passage King revealed his vision of a better tomorrow for America.He stated that even though he faces difficulties, he still maintained that dream. This helped to strengthen this portion of his speech tremendously. On August 28, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave one of historys most beautifully executed pieces of rhetoric. The language incorporated in the speech helped vex Kings message to America challenge discrimination and the status quo and strive for an equal society. This will live on as one of Kings greatest contributions to the advancement of civil rights. Today, it clay a significant part of Kings legacy.

Modern audience Essay

In Romeo and Juliet, the play is go under in the 1590s, which is a very different way of life than today. So to be the play appeal to an audience of today it needs to be altered a little. I would set it in England. In the bustling city of Newcastle outside of St Jamess Park (Newcastle Uniteds Football Ground). The trouble pass on occur between two groups of rival football supporters, which are Newcastle (Montague) and Liverpool (Capulet). 2 supporters of Liverpool will play the roles of Sampson and Gregory. They will be sitting down outside the stadium waiting for the collar to start with a bottle of vodka in a brown paper bag. One will be wearing a black Liverpool coat and blue jeans and the other will wear a Liverpool tee shirt and black jeans. They joke together and boast that they are superior to the Newcastle supporters Me they shall feel while I am able to stand, and tis known I am a pretty piece of flesh.Then they are go about with two Newcastle supporters (the serving men). They will both be wearing Newcastle shirts and jeans. Sampson and Gregory hesitate whether to cause a cow dung of trouble or to leave them alone. They decide to annoy the Newcastle supporters, this is to provoke them so they throw the first punch. The Liverpool supporters do this by making gestures indirectly at them. In Elizabethan times biting your own ovolo at people was a rude gesture, and this is what Sampson and Gregory do in the play. But this gesture is not so common at all today, so to modernise it, the gesture will be spitting in front of the Newcastle supporters as they walk past. Then the Newcastle supporters ask the two if they spat at them Do you incinerate your thumb at us, sir? and the Liverpool supporter says no he didnt do it towards him on purpose.Then enters Benvolio who will be wearing a Newcastle shirt as well, he is a friend of the motorbus of Newcastle who looks aft(prenominal) the stadium. Instead of stiring with swords they will use their fists. Tybalt enters and will be on Liverpools side and he quarrels with Benvolio Turn thee, Benvolio, look upon thy death, Then they fight. Several supporters join in from round the corner. Then come the jurisprudence to stop what is now fast becoming a rioting. The Liverpool footballers arrive on their bus oblivious to the riot, the charabanc of the football team (Capulet) is pulled off the bus and is forced to fight his way out. Then arrives the other manager (Montague) on a bus also. The highest rank of the stadium security (Prince Escales) leads the rest of the guards to stop this riot.After the fight has calmed down everyone has been arrested or taken to hospital except Benvolio, Montague and then enters his wife who was supposed to enter at the same time as Montague but in modern days a women would not rent herself in a fight. Montague then worries about his son Romeo he thinks he might have been involve in the brawl O where is Romeo? Saw you him today? Then enters Romeo and it seems he was not in the riot as he is wearing his Newcastle t-shirt and his jeans which are clean and arent ripped or torn. Then Benvolio and Romeo talk of the town together about Romeos troubles. Which leads into the next scene.

Ethics and Legal Issue Essay

At the time I worked as a custodian in a department store, I was face with an ethical dilemma of whether accepting a bribe from a colleague of higher position to pull wires cash transactions in her favor. This was of course an issue for me since I knew manipulating business transactions is unethical and wrong, more than so that it involves the companys resources. However, I realized I really did not have to conceive it through. I instantly said no, that I suddenly could not do it because I knew it was an absolutely dishonest act.My colleague just shrugged and I thought maybe he was used to such a reaction. People decide differently. When faced with such situation, it would be just normal that two different persons would issue up with different finales, probably either going with what the boss wants or going against it. This may be because of different beliefs, of which is the right thing to do or different needs, probably experiencing dire need of cash or maybe even a feeling of powerlessness compared to the boss.An ethical issue such as the situation presented above may entail, for nearly, deep thinking of what is righteous or not or with regards to what decision to take when faced with such a choice. Basically, we know that the bon ton decides what is immoral or not. It is the societys norms, which refer to what is unethical or not. But is it the person himself who determines what is right. Some people believe some things are right, others believe otherwise. It all depends on the person.Even the rightfulness of what is right has always been a motility surrounded by different cultures with different beliefs and principles. Despite the gift of intellect and rationality, sometimes humans still choke to perform a reasoned judgment of ethical issues, instead fall prey to gut reactions or immediate and ignorant decisions. This may be probably due to the persons attitudes, how gullible he is, or not, to such ethical situations the environment or society he grew up in how imbibed choosing between right and wrong is on the person and his personal decisions as well.

How People Grow Reflection Paper by Cloud and Townsend

REFLECTION PAPER OF HOW mess GROW BOOK BY CLOUD AND TOWNSENDVillatoro-Ramirez Counseling Department Denver Seminary Monte Hasz Psy. D. Elisabeth A. Nesbit, Ph. D. CO 631 01 career Development and Assessment October 8, 2012 Reading How People Grow ( buy and T admitsend, 2001) has been an interesting induce because the author of this papers knowledge about chew up over has been transformed in different panaches. This reading has forced me to evaluate my own snuggle to counseling and my apparitional behavior has been impacted through the reflection about grace and rightfulness as well.I appreciate that this discussion has already been translated to Spanish language, which has given me the opportunity to read faster and fail understanding of some ideas because Spanish is my first language. I have already included this book as a required reading to the course of Pastoral Care, which is taught at Denver Seminarys Hispanic Initiatives because in my personal opinion this book is useful for in all mickle in Christian ministry who wants to know how people wax. Thus, through this paper I will explain my understanding on how people generate check to obliterate and Townsend.In addition, I will critique the book comparing it with two of the systems of integration presented in severalise by Drs. Nesbit and Hasz. To accomplishing it this paper has been divided in three areas. The first explains my personal understanding about what hide and Townsend (2001) secern about how people conjure. The second area compares this book with two systems of integration, which are Biblical counseling and the Integration approach. Finally, the rest of the paper focuses on reflection and application as a re lineage for clients.First, I think demoralize and Townsend (2001) use the concept of Christian counseling and discipleship or personal evoketh in the same way. For them on that point is non difference between spiritual life and real life (21). The magnetic core of t heir book presents the idea of working on relational and emotional issues back into the mainstream of spiritual growth (21). It shag be seen in the chapter the Paradise lost where Cloud started to describe that at the time that he began his ministry there were quadruple models of how people grow (16).He was clear saying that he saw value in these four models practicing all of them in some degree even though he was inclined for the model of accuracy which held that the truth would the person free. If the person was non free or some area of life was non working it moldiness be because lacked truth in the life of this person (16). However, and even though Cloud (2001) saw people improve, and prayer, learning Scripture, and repentance were very powerful elements in healing many clinical conditions he realized that something was missing in all these elements (18).He realized that all these spiritual methods did not adjudicate some problems (18). People were helped but not cured (18 ). Thus, Cloud (2001) became disillusioned and went for further training and has experience with sincere Christian people who had been very diligent about spiritual growth but without succeeder (19). However, he continued to work in Christian counseling for a few years to a greater extent when he started to see processes that actually changed peoples lives (19). These processes were not the traditional Christian way to grow that he had learned.These processes involved deep transformations of the soul and there was the spiritual life, where we learned about God and grew in our relationship to him, and then there was the emotional and relational life, where we learned how to solve real-life problems (19). In other words, twain Cloud and Townsend (2001) believe that the issues why people come for counseling are not growth issues or counseling issues, but spiritual growth issues (21). In addition, Cloud and Townsend (2001) emphasis that spiritual growth should concern relationship pr oblems, emotional problems, and all other problems of life (22).For them there is no difference between spiritual life and real life because it is all one. They go through the major categories of Christian doctrine and shed about how each doctrine applies to personal growth (23). Second, about the comparison of this book with two systems of integration, I think in some point Cloud and Townsend (2010) are part of the biblical counseling approach which focus is on the sufficiency of the Scripture for counseling needs.A definite strength for Cloud and Townsends book is their use of the watchword and appeal to its authority as well. Contrary to Scotts presentation of Biblical counseling, Cloud and Townsend (2010) are not directive and sermonic. They are more practical and enlighten the process of how people grow through the emotional and relational life, where they share practical ideas about how to solve real-life problems. In this sense, there is not way to use their method out of t he church or Christian environments, which I think it is a weakness of their method.In other words, following this methodology a counselor would not seek the govern kind blurb of a professional license and cannot work in lay counseling settings as a rule. Because Cloud and Townsend (2001) at the beginning of their book expressed through some examples of Christian people facing mental problems in a hospital, I thought that they may lean toward the integration approach looking to lay models for treatment techniques. However, in the rest of their book they did not mention about a different way of treatment more than practical counseling application of the Bible.In addition to this point I can say that it seems to me that Cloud and Townsend (2001) use group therapy as a source of help people even though they say that working in group is an international spiritual source that God has given us to grow. I think to working in a Christian environment, this idea of groups to help people t o grow is powerful. However, it seems to me that Cloud and Townsend (2001) did not want to be related to the four methods that were at that time they began to work on counseling.However, this book ends doing almost the same thing that biblical counseling in the sense that does not expectant space for secular techniques as a source of help other than the Bible. Cloud and Townsend (2001) differentiate privileged and external sources that God has given us to grow (126). For them internal sources are Bible, prayer, and Holy Spirit and external sources are all help that others can gives us as a way of help. In this sense, they talk widely about the work in groups, which I think it may be a secular technique however they did not recognize that.It seems to me that they are ambiguous not telling that they are have some secular techniques in their work at Christian environments. Finally, because Cloud and Townsend (2001) were clear to say that their want that their book be practical, and help the reader (I think Christian reader) to understand how the growth process is theological. I agree that in my life they accomplish that desire because there are some areas of application that I can mention that would like to implement in my ministry. First thing that I learned in the reading of How people grow Cloud and Townsend, 2001) was the concept of grace and law. I think in our Christian world we have misunderstood the concept of grace and that is why we live under the idea of a God who is ready to punish us. At least it is what I discovered on my own life through this reading. I like how Cloud and Townsend (2001) explained that grace is something that we cannot give ourselves because it comes from outside of us, as unmerited elevate and we can not do anything to obtain grace (127). It was powerful to me learning that grace is an external source of healing that we can give and receive through the body of Jesus, the church.I appreciate that Cloud and Townsend (2001) remin d us that God created us to be in relationship with others so it is through others that people can grow as well. I love this concept because it is perverse with what our individualistic culture says. In addition, this concept is contrary with some teachings that say that people do not need other people at all because Christ alone is sufficient or that his Word or prayer is enough. These teachings actively and directly triad others to not depend on people at all because they think it is wrong.I like how Cloud and Townsend (2001) explained that the Bible teaches that all these things are part of the process, including other people (121). Through the book both of them Cloud and Townsend (2001) stress loudly the component part of the body in the process of how people grow. In sum, how people grow (Cloud and Townsend, 2001) is a great tool for counselors who work in Christian environments because offers practical ideas about based on the Scripture. other than to the Biblical counseli ng approach, Cloud and Townsend (2001) focus on the grace instead of the law.In addition, Cloud and Townsend (2001) emphasize the role of the body of Jesus as a source of growth in the life of the believer. Cloud and Townsend (2001) is not recommended for counselors who work in a secular settings even though the principles that come directly from the Bible must be applicable in the personal life that any Christian counselor no weigh where his or her jobs place be. References Cloud, H. , and Townsend, J. (2001). How people grow What the Bible reveals about personal growth. portentous Rapids, MI Zondervan

With reference to Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, discuss the Essay

With reference to Jane Austens feel and Prejudice, discuss the Romantics active and complex involvement with gender - Essay ExampleIt was during this era when the essence of a woman revolved on bearing and invokeing children. History will tell us that women thus were deprived of basic rights. To illustrate such vision, women were denied of formal education and prohibited to exercise the right to suffrage. They stood poop the shadows of great men who ruled bon ton during that time. Branded as mans attendant and helper, women were treat as second-rate citizens. Thus, women of the 19th century were nominated with only two roles to portray, either submissive companions of their husbands or industrious housewives and caring mothers to their children. These are the only cherished triumphs of the women who lived in that period. In 1972, British feminist bloody shame Wollst anecraft authored a book entitled A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Political and Moral Sub jects. She was one of the first highly acclaimed authors on feminist philosophy. In this book, she argues that women are not natur bothy inferior to men, that only appear to be for lack of education. She suggests that men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason (Wollstonecraft). She emphasized the importance of women in society because they bear children, rear and educate them to become good citizens of society. Women should not only be regarded as objects that are to be traded in marriage, but must be accorded the same fundamental rights as men because men and women are co-equals. Wollstonecraft insisted that all political authority should rest on the grounds of reason and justice alone, she demanded that every person be entitled to enjoy and dispense the fruits of his and her own labors, that inequality of rank be eliminated (Mellor 32). The social restrictions of women in the eighteenth Century became one of main subjects illu strated in Jane Austens book, Pride and Prejudice, wherein the character of Elizabeth Bennet, was shown as an example of how a woman can survive the challenges of a male-conquered society through her distinct brilliance, charm and intelligence. II. DISCUSSION The relay station in Austens novel is Elizabeth Bennet. She is often described as an intelligent young, witty woman and, playful, though exhibiting sheer impertinence did not make her distasteful to others. Her familys financial condition forced her to attempt out a marriage for convenience. She remained the ideal woman of her time as she expressed her intention to conjoin for love. She was branded as one of Austens beloved heroines of all time. In the novel, Elizabeth was forced to conform to the predominate social restrictions in place, which included a marriage for convenience. Elizabeth is then met the high and mighty, Mr. Darcy, who was enamoured by her simplicity and wit. However, society dictates that Mr. Darcy shoul d marry a woman of aristocracy, beyond Elizabeths social class. This circumstance wounded her pride, and thus caused her to comfort prejudices against Mr. Darcy. Austen is regarded as an affirmative novelist. Positive values of good sense, kindness candor and restraint of egotistical impulses are exhibited by the characters in her novel. Morality is dominant in her written works, and does not consist in swallowing safe and sound the values which society offers her, and her moral affirmations are always qualified by important critical or ironic reservations (Nardin 3). This was exactly the purpose of Elizabeths character, unconventional and unafraid of the limitations imposed by society. She was envisioned as full of pride and her truthful

Rhetoric & Stereotypes Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Rhetoric & Stereotypes - Research Paper ExampleEfforts are organism done in many countries to remove the stereotyping of different sort outs in this alliance. Stereotyping varies to every class in the monastic order but here in this essay the four types of groups which would be emphasized are Politicians, tattooed persons, feminists and sr. citizens. The tattooed individuals in this world are one set of groups which is stereotyped as per a single nonion. These individuals usually befuddle tattoos signed up on their body which can either be huge or small. and these individuals are stereotyped as per these tattoos. Usually it is thought that these individuals relate to heap who are rockers, punks, brats, criminal or a person who has loose morals. The feminists on the other hand are women who consider themselves equal or superior to men. This set of individual argues for the rights of women in this world. These women are stereotyped on the basis of their behavior i.e. their sh ame for the opposite sex. Because of this hatred these women are usually labeled as lesbians and chauvinists. Thirdly the politicians are one group of people which can be said to be stereotyped the most. The politicians are one group of people which is thought to be a con group which makes false promises to make up their way to the trail position. Moreover these politicians are known to be a group which excels in cheating and corruption. And lastly major(postnominal) citizens are a group of individuals who are old and knowledgeable. This group of people is known to be dogged and inefficient when it comes to completing tasks. These individuals are considered to be weak and not worthy enough to do both(prenominal) work. All these groups mentioned above do not tend to pattern the same picture in the society as different stereotypes are developed according to different way of thoughts. The tattooed individuals tend to pose a negative stereotype usually. The feminists can pose both a negative and a compulsive stereotype. The positive stereotype created by them is related to equality which is long deserved by women. Politicians can similarly pose a negative and positive stereotype. It is dependent on the individual attributes that the politician possesses to make up the stereotype. Politicians are mostly considered as corrupt because of the views of the general population. The honest politicians are being stereotyped because of their corrupt counterparts. This creates a stereotyping image of the politicians in the minds of the general population which is true to a certain extent. And senior citizens can also show both stereotypes. Negative in the sense that these citizens are usually hot headed and do not tend to listen to others. Whereas positive in the sense in which these citizens can provide knowledge in areas of which they know better than the younger individuals of the society. Both the negatives and positive stereotyping of the senior citizens are also true as some of the senior citizens are found to be getting irritated very soon. Some senior citizens on the other hand are cool minded and tend to inform the audience almost their past and history. The historic stereotyping of women was based on portraying this gender as weak, shy, beautiful, caring, sensitive and quiet individuals. They were shown as beauty objects with high respect. Most of the pictures used for advertisements were of plain, expressionless faces with graceful but least exposing dressing. Those advertisements were based on the idea that women are objects that must be looked at but not listened to. However,

Organisations Design Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Organisations Design - Essay Examplectively silence reproval and concerns by the rank and file, a gloss that mocked and ignored ethical compliance issues, and numerous other elements that decrease their effective impulse control, morality, concern over their actions and ability to perceive the inevitable consequences of their actions. Definition of socialisation Schein defines culture thusly a pattern of basic assumptions...developed by a given group as it learns to manage with its problems of remote adaptation and internal integration...considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to...think (1985, p. 9). Culture can be considered to be separate from but clearly intertwined with institutional characteristics. Institutional decisions to scuttle external auditing and accounts is an institutional decision. The sentiments behind that decision that laugh at external controls and view them as unnecessary is a cultural trait of the organisation. ... . ethics successful, driven, focused, philanthropic and responsible (Sims and Brinkmann, 2003). Just as the company had seemed to be the favorite of Wall Street and invulnerable to failure, it also seemed to be a truly responsible company. Of course, it is important to peak that not everyone bought into Enrons golden story. Greg Palast, an investigative journalist for The Guardian, had been writing exposes on Enron for years (2004). Palast in a retro on Enron in 2002 argued that Enrons collapse was predictable due to a combination of lackluster media criticism that keep after the crisis, a culture of political irresponsibility and a sense of political entitlement, arrogance, and other factors hotshot tabloid...called Baxter a hero...This is the Baxter who last year quietly crawled out of Enron...then dumped his stock on unsuspecting buyers... on that point have been a lot of misplaced tears in the Affair Enron. The employees were shafted, no doubt virtually it. But the shar eholders? I didnt hear any of them moan when Enron stock shot up through the ceiling when the company, joined by a half dozen other power pirates, manipulated, monopolised and muscled the California electricity trade a year ago...Enron and half a dozen others skinned purchasers for more than $12bn in excess charges....Enron sell 500 megawatts of power to the state for delivery over a 15-megawatt line...The company knew darn well the succus couldnt make it over the line, causing panic in the state - customers would then pay 10 propagation the normal cost... The federal regulator caught that one. Within weeks of taking office, George Bush demoted the troublesome official. Lay boasted to one panorama expected to replace the sacked regulator that